Monday, June 10, 2013

The Hope for Bi-vocational Ministry


Over the past few years, I have had the privilege and the burden of working two part-time jobs: a privilege because of the communities I was serving and leading and a burden because of the low-pay and timeshare arrangement.  Even now that I’ve finished up one of my positions, I still think that I didn’t quite manage the shared responsibilities efficiently enough.  And at the end of every month, we are pinching pennies to hold off ‘til the next paycheck.  Yet, I’m heading into a new ministry where I will once again be bi-vocational.  So, I’ve been thinking a lot recently about the benefits of bi-vocational ministry. 

I should preface this by saying that these thoughts are simply that- thoughts.  I’ve also witnessed too many churches place their pastors through the ringer, expecting too much, paying too little, and damaging their families in the process.  The church ought to be the kind of community where burdens are shared, needs are met, and stress and worry are relieved.  Perhaps this has more to say about church hierarchy and the remarkable way it turns churches into a “fee for services” rendered arrangement.  And yet, a part of me is drawn, at least conceptually, to bi-vocational ministry.  Allow me to share three points:

1). Bi-Vocational ministry ought to be missionally construed.  Many pastors are forced to be bi-vocational due to financial instability.  But I believe bi-vocational ministry may be an effective way to lead alongside a community.  In my future context in Kona, my part-time job won’t be approached as “on-the-side.”  Rather, it will be a means to inhabit the local context, learn the rhythms of the culture, and be aware of the social dynamics that make up the place.  I can think of no better way to assimilate into a culture than by working within the community.  A job doesn’t just help pay the bills.  If approached correctly, a job opens one up to new relationships.  Co-workers, clients, guests, and work partnerships all connect an individual to a wide variety of networks already situated on the ground.  When open to the possibility of these relationships and learning to listen to where God’s grace has already begun to work, a part-time job enables all kinds of creative missional engagement.

2). Bi-vocationality strips away the divide between professional clergy and lay congregant.  I hear a lot of pastors preach on the workplace as mission field.  But I know very few pastors who are actual friends with non-Christians.  We spend so much of our time “shepherding the found,” writing sermons, studying, and stuck in church administration that “workplace as mission field” fails to stick.  It fails to stick because we have no experience in actually discipling Christians in the workplace environment.  We know a part of discipleship  is imitation; it’s hard to imitate a full time pastor because the social dynamic of work and life are so different.  A missionary-pastor who works alongside others in the community, embodying the way of servant-leadership and emboldening others to also live in God’s life and mission, is more equipped to call others to pattern their lives in the same fashion. 

3). Bi-vocational ministry depends on the gifts of others in leadership and the grace of God to continue to work.  The church has operated out of a very hierarchical model of leadership for millennia.  But a missional posture demands more shared responsibilities, a more communal disposition, and a dissemination of power rather than a centralization of it.  We’ve relied too much on the myth of a Cowboy-pastor who can do everything.  Bi-vocational ministry necessitates shared/communal leadership.  In this way of operating, listening and submission to the community come before our particular agendas.  We probably all have stories of someone bull-dozing their ideas through a committee or meeting, leaving other potential leaders impotent.  A submissive posture better enables the equipping of lay leaders to recognize and live into their God-given gifts and passions.  A bi-vocational pastor is kind of forced into this healthy dependence.  Ultimately, it creates space to once again know that we are not the saviors of our churches or community- Jesus is Lord.

So, what am I missing?  Is this possible on the ground?  Or, are there other benefits to bi-vocational ministry you’d like to share?

David Fitch influenced some of the above thoughts heavily, you can read further here:


No comments: